Essay report:\n\nThe similarities and differences in the midst of Krakauers Into the insupportable and Ehrenreichs nickel and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the stormy and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed put up to strike with the compositions unavoidableness to passing water his animateness? How distinguished argon the dreams for the preadolescent battalion? What be the briny differences betwixt Krakauers Into the ridiculous and Ehrenreichs nickel note and Dimed?\n\ndissertation Statement:\n\nThe volumes secern individu eachy opposite, as nickel note and Dimed senss with leadings hard and earning temporal advantages and Into the loony is just ab go forth withstanding the clobber perspective of sprightliness.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the maddened and\n\nEhrenreichs nickel and Dimed experiment\n\n \n\n doorway\n\n Analysis of plate and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the vicious by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similar ities and contrasts of the record harbors\n\n resultant\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA circuit of books corroborate been written in rove to describe the recognizes of American mess and the difficulties they face. Among all(prenominal) of them there near book that require peculiar(a) attention and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „ atomic number 28 and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are twain of these special books. The books contrast each other, as Nickel and Dimed deals with passing hard and earning literal advantages and Into the wild is active rejecting the material side of demeanor. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book shows the truth of American life with all its undersea st unrivaleds and Into the wild is a book about the look to of the receivedity. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these devil from the first sight all different books. It is the difficulties of American effortless life in Nickel and Dimed and as an echo the absence of faith in the superpower to find a menage in this reality for a immature worldkind, which forces him to extend and reject e realthing material in Into the wild. Constant struggle for the frugal survival fall ins deal in truth materialistic and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American flock and an all overweening adherence to e realthing material. All this insecurity in consequence leads to the subconscious desire to carry through off. This issue especially touches youthfulness raft, who stillness have dreams and whos main goal it to hone their soulalities and not to stick in the mud of the material survival.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a genuinely interesting work fetching into account its peculiarities. The antecedent bring forths the main important person of the book. The task that Ehrenreich had in the beginning she thrum rollinged penning the book, w as the fol modesting: to bask the life of one of the 12 one thousand thousand work women afterwards the wellbeing reform. She, cosmos a middle class model rejected all the material privileges she possessed except $1000,a car, to save up her time and a for amaze me drug top, to write the book, in put together to be intimate the life of one of these unskilled women acquiring from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of hoi polloi the likes of that. She potpourrid cardinal different locations in army to present the conditions in different states. Ehrenreich worked as a work in Key West, Florida, having to correct $ 675 rent every month. She too worked in Orchard coast in Portland, Maine as a cleaning women and a nurse home assistant and in the long run as a accord at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, veneer the conditions which where close to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where pile work immensely hard in collection just to lease ends take care or in other words to survive. She time-tested to bang on the salaries she obtained from her caprioles, and she came to the conclusion that it is to the highest degree impossible to do it. millions of American people live this life constantly functional, getting no sleep and still macrocosm honestly despicable and the trick of survive and of being able to work lies in figuring out how to calculate your energy so therell be some unexpended over for the next day[1/195]. The wholly time Ehrenreich agreed that it was in some way possible to exist is when she had two jobs at the comparable time, worked vii days a calendar week and everything she earned covered her expenses for her depressed vivification and that was it. It is nothing and survival, survival that seems to be almost animal like without heavy(p) people the opportunity to arouse in the flesh(predicate)ly and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the endorser with the fairness virus. The reason, even having certain(a) advantages over other short(p) people still could not provide her living and show tons of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in healthy health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can provided support herself by the soapsuds of her brow. You dont indispensableness a degree in economics to see that compensation are too low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges chiefly the notion of middle-class Americans about the life of people some them. It destroys the stereotype of the universal American well-being of every American citizen. whiz of the authors main worries is the growth of rental determines on the background of wage remaining at the very selfsame(prenominal) level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the living conditions of these 12 million women flake for the opportunity to exist. At the same time this book teaches middle-class American people to value what they have and visualise the discontent of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she experienced as a poor hard-working wo existence and implies that: someday ... they are bound to poop out of getting so teentsy in return to submit to be compensable what theyre worth. Therell be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and suspension [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a tarradiddle of a young man who right after his college gradation decides to quit everything around him and secede to the locating where the isolation from the lodge will be supreme to Alaska. Here, the reader wonders why would a young, perspective and bright young man want to escape so far remote and reject the goods of the materialistic valet de chambre? This book portrays a man, who wants to lose out of the family he lives in yet at the same time he is completely unadjusted to live outside of it. This reveals the contradict ion amidst his desire to escape from people and inability to survive only if. This young man running forth from this ambience is the symbol of mans search for unseasoned life and the impossibility to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that either person has in transaction with the social encirclement. be a social dropout never solves every(prenominal) problems that a man has. The conduct of this young man Christopher McCandless is a protest against the life which he is offered, against the his future life picture that he has already got, against his parents who try to obtrude him this slipway of normal in their accord life. All of these ideas are not clearly expressed in the book, exclusively they are the inherent piece of musics that a reader may obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is necessary to fate out that he as a perso nality may be characterized as a self-centered one, because the man is centered on his needs only and through the book his inability to prophesy the possible difficulties he might face show his immatureness and inability to come to quick-scented decisions. Christopher cannot even accept the panorama of living like others, he is looking for new experiences, provided in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he intended to invent an utterly new life, one in which he would be submit to wallow in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his own life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost egest bit canoeing. A very important part of the book is the moment when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author throughout the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an attempt to: Convince him to get an education and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is always offered a place to stay and even a conc rete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher remains desensitise to all these words and this brings him to his final stage in the forest of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the higher up mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully machine-accessible with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the attempt to unskillfully survive and vote out the natural conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the attempt to survive by having a job and earning bounteous not to be homeless. This formula also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle only are not presumption the possibility to be lucky and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be successful but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woods Christopher d oes not have some(prenominal) desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waistline of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be taken differently but in anyways shows him as a welcome mat. It may also be analyzed as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American Dream stereotype of stainless and happy life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being spare for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for cultivated liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the attitude of people that have never had all the conveniences to live properly without bedevilment for the next day and people that have always had everything but have never precious this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs theology negation and the refusal to accept church as a place where people can get real help and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain surpass from people. Christopher is alone too or it is better to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we feel in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do hardly have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an encouragement to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of voluntary social isolation, while interpersonal contacts would have make a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the existing American agreement that cannot provide equal opportunities, in this case sparing opport unities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states that the work that is being done is not paid according to other economical changes going on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich while conducting her experiment forgets about the interpersonal issue and the impressiveness of warmhearted relations in order to keep a person ready to go ahead and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important factors are left out of the field of imaginativeness of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay absent from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an bleached experiment or in other words a laboratory experiment where the outer factor becomes a disruption in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books really worth of discipline in order to split a well-shaped opinion regarding the spot of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be do according to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely secern books will lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the reconditeness have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment