Thursday, March 14, 2019
A Looking Glass Fogged :: Journalism Journalist Essays
A Looking Glass FoggedIn reportage, it is sometimes the case that a story is told from a certain point of view due to policy-making pressures, especially when dispute surrounds the subject matter. One such case is the reporting on the Chinese-Tibetan conflict, in which chinas overwhelming political and fiscal power has the potential difference to seep into the affairs of newspaper owners. In my paper, I will audition a certain event as it was published in a variety of newspapers, and how their reportage differs from the AP Worldstream report. Additionally, I will analyze what appears to be an passing one-sided report and how it is of benefit to its publisher.China has always sought to culturally integrate Tibet with the Chinese mainland, for reasons as diverse as the parties involved. Recently this has verbalized itself in the form of a planned railway reaching from capital of Red China to Lhasa, the Tibetan Capital. China has justified this action with its usual stance on Tibe tan integration, as an effort to modernize Tibet for its own good and provide it with an influx of labor and industry. Groups opposed to the project fear that the railway will grow a new wave of Chinese settlers who will dilute the regions ridiculous culture and exploit the land for its re extensions. (AP-Worldstream)The Associated Press is a news source for news sources. Their business consists of covering events and reselling the reports to a variety of papers, so it is in their interest to stay as neutral as possible. In their coverage of the Railway project they cover both sides equally, starting with Chinas moral responsibility to enrich the Tibetan culture with an inflow of Chinese culture and labor. To retell Shi, an overseer Tibet has been without the railway, but now they will have the same salient things and great life as us.(2) While the Chinese side makes no mention of this, the AP report covers political motives for this $3.3 billion investment. With the railroad i n place, China would be able to immediately deploy troops to stomp each sort of Tibetan uprising as well as change the area and culture with Chinese immigrants, furthering Chinas grip on the Tibetan region. The hold does a thorough job of showing both unrelenting sides of the way out - the Chinese developers zeal for getting the railroad underway and wants for further development, transaction and opportunities, and the Tibetan fear of exploitation and cultural dilution.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment