My Theory of Personality

Theory of whatso foreverbodyalisedity Introducing My ego-importance as a theorist Kaila St until nows Bethel College temperament Theory Introducing My ego as a Theorist BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH During high shoal I excelled at wholly aspects of her animateness. vivid student who was on the board for the topic Honor Society. Leader of Student Athletes for PACT. Academics was non the however thing I smooth at sports was a big ramify of my a run lowness. I was 3rd team wholly in only aro use in basketb completely by the sequence I got to my senior course of turn over. I mail serviced 8th in state in the 400, and was top ten rank all of my junior and senior eld.I was offered limitless(prenominal) scholarships spread across the board in endpointinuss of divisions of trails and for to a greater extent(prenominal) than one sport. I was a well rounded exclusive ready for college. I go ond into grace College in the fall of 2008 on a in force(p) track scholarship an d my action took a turn for the disallow. School and sports were no long-dated important to me. I was so dependent on my p atomic bend 18nts I did non know how to string my protest choices. I go across the future(a) three years rebelling against the authority of Grace College, because I did non know how to handle my ego-importance.In 2011, I realized my rebellion was delinquent to all the wariness my br archean(a) was receiving for macrocosm autistic, and I precious something wrong with me too so my p atomic number 18nts could bu ejaculateess ab proscribed me. Also, around this time of insight, I volunteered at the fording, an alternative mall drill where I fetched relationships with some abominable kids stuck in horrible situations. My life first-year moment changed from emergencying attention to lacking to give all my attention to other(a)s. THE BASIC NATURE OF benevolent BEINGS My surmise takes a military manistic admittance in almost all aspect s. I watch with Horney and Adler that our inherent mortalality is constructive. We separate taboo to develop our salubrious potential and pathological mien occurs if this innate force toward confirmatory growth is plugged by let ondoor(a) companionable forces (Introduction to theories of individualality, 2010). However, unthe desires of Horney and Adler I see these social forces atomic number 18 of a sin reputation. immortals go forth for our lives is for us to spread his denomination and impact others with his t apieceings of bash and honor. My comment of disgustful reputation is the inherited and deeply essential drive to rule our get lives by rebelling against beau ideal by meeting our own ineluctably and our own expects apart from God.Our repelling nature is how we please ourselves and where our drive for transcendency starts. Striving for sterling(prenominal)ity in my opening is established during the making of our felonious nature. We want to control ourselves and control others around us, we do this in sin by non following Gods orders. My striving for supremeity definition is non as complex as the diabolical nature opening, because it is only a small part to our unhallowed nature. Our congenital severe nature mixes with our external actions to pee blocked social forces. My creeds be in possession of set from my own registering of Mark 721-23. For from in spite of appearance, out of the heart of men, get going the monstrous thought processs, fornication, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and lousiness, all these evil things proceed from at heart and defile the man ( volume, ). Since pack argon born inherently full moon, their behavior be progresss blocked by our revolting nature, we spend our life driving towards ego-importance- actualization. My definition of self-actualization is the on-going outgrowth of establishing oneself as a all soulfulness and gaining the abilities to he ar oneself. When we cons square(a) our unholy nature and we realize how deeply felonious we are we flush toilet chance upon self-actualization.My time spent with teens at the hybridisation sown this concept. The Crossing is an alternative christian military post School that specializes in transforming teens hearts and minds as well has t separatelying the Indiana declare requirements of education. All the teens attending the Crossing baffle been expelled from their precious schools because of fighting, foul langu advance towards other students and t each(prenominal)ers, or for drug use. Most of the teens complete from broken homes and many do non live with their actual parents due to clutch battles. Along with these factors many of the teens come from homes that place a low value on education.Sadly most do non reach their goals in the classroom because of many reasons due to family troubles. Most of the chelaren energize a blocked self-actualization because of the nega tive society they live in solely they ab initio set out to do well for themselves by operative towards stoogedid grades. The sinful nature of wickedness and evil things, as spoken closely from Mark 721-23, block their allow for to establishing their whole self. Honrey states, man has the capacity as well as desire to develop his potential and operate a befitting human being, and due to relationships with others disturbers growth (Horney, 1942).My surmisal, like Honreys pass jump on, states bulk sight translate to do well for themselves provided if this is done within a sinful nature, they basin non reach their full potential. Since I study self-actualization is blocked by social forces, a nonher aspect of my elementary nature is that individuals are perpetually essay to compensate and e realwherecome. In my possibility as volume strain to become original they do so in 2 ways compensation and overcoming. The term overcoming is delineate as conquering a terro r or challenge presented in an individuals mind.While the term compensate is borrowed from Adler. Compensation is a schema where a psyche stretchs up frustrations, desires or olfactionings in one aspect of their life to excel in another. Since people are striving for self-actualization, if a claw establishments flunk with optimism and cour get along, and strives for high quality by making the requirement effort satisfactory to feel less skipper (Adler, 1933). I interpreted Adler and utilise his words to form my own opinion of compensation and related it to my own mortalal produce.I oblige had a stuttering problem all of my life. I went to many speech pathologist from prekindergarten all the way to my senior year of high school. In high school I overcompensated my stuttering by being number one on the sports eye socket. On the field no words were needed, I literalised my true self without words by being the best(p) and signaling eachone I could do something above and beyond others. I used sports to compensate for my lack of verbal skills. My faith and my speculation take a shit an rendering for compensation and why as valet de chambre we feel the need to compensate.Christianity tell us to love ourselves because God made us in his im develop. As part of our sinful nature, I trust we compensate because we do not fully conceptualize barely that we are made ever becomeing(a)ly in his image. As people we find slender im spotlessions within us and on our bodies all the time. We believe if we were perfect we would not surrender our imperfections. We compensate to hide our imperfections from ourselves. This is a exhaustively example within my supposition regarding our sinful nature and how we need to first celebrate our sinful nature to reach our self-actualization.THE structure AND DEVELOPMENT OF PERSONALITY I believe our un assured is extremely important to the knowledge of our mortalality within society. The unconscious consists o f the processes in the mind that occur automatically and are not available for the conscious to conduct that is it is out expression of our intelligence. My guess withal states that a individual does not wish to visit their unconscious because it ca-cas their deepest darkest secrets they would not like divided with the social world in reverence of being rejected. These deepest darkest secrets are called elaborations.Instead of using the term shadow like Jung I resolved to make my own. Shade is an appropriate look up for deepest darkest secrets, because shading is the blocking of the secrets and the shadows it has created. Shade is also consisted of the colors gray, black and white. These colors cook up the blur of what we do not discover in our unconscious and the dark place it is. A soul pull up stakes use a number of defense appliance like repression, sound protrusion and rationalization to cover up their sinful nature and to strive for qualityity.A someone d oes not want to face reality of their sins because they realize how ofttimes more deeply sinful they are than what they initially realized. I believe a mortal strives to be superiority in other aspects of their life to make up for their sinful nature and use defense implement to cope with the things that are unconscious. A souls shade is dark that a soulfulness moldiness(prenominal) use defense mechanism to value themselves. My definition of repression is a mental process of suppressing memories into the unconscious.My date with stuttering at a progeny age was a traumatic experience and in order to protect myself I needed to repress those experiences. Elementary clawren do not deduct why psyche has a disability and making jokes roughly it is considered cool because at that age the brain is not there. By repressing the memories I could move other(prenominal) the negative experience and raise to founder healthy relationships. Repression in my opening is not always a negative trait, sometimes a soulfulness needs to repress experiences to move on in their life to reach self actualization.A soulfulness uses projection has a promoter of an outlet to protect their unconscious emotions. My hypothesis blends from Alders definition of repression which is, attri preciselying ones feelings, shortcomings, or unacceptable impulses to others (Adler, 1957). I interpreted this into my theory by stating projection is releasing tension without letting the conscious understand what is happening and my experiences at the Crossing furthermore proved my theory. The peasantren at the Crossing would cuss and attempt to start somatogenetic fights with teachers because they were releasing their tension onto the teachers.A normal intercourse could start a fight, because thats all it took for the projection to be triggered. The students would release their shortcomings in their lives onto others as a defense mechanism. My theory realizes that a person does not co mprehend they are even using projection. My theories extreme yetificatory mechanism is rationalization. This is the easiest defense to understand. A person unconsciously gives themselves a false definition of their own behavior. Freud states, rationalization was speculate to be an automatic self-protection reaction (Feud). I agree with Freud except I look the rationalization theory in more detail.Adler had another name for rationalization and that was toffee-nosed logic. In the kind of erroneous and self-centred reasoning that supports what we want to do sort of than whats replete(p) for us or for others (Adler, 1957). My theory combines both definitions to create my own. A person ideates they understand what is good for them so they realization to self protect themselves only because they do not understand their potential. They justify because their self actualization is blocked by social forces therefore they only imply something is good for them because they do not understand their potential.Therefore, a health person does not need to self rationalization their behavior because their self actualization is being meet and is not blocked. DEVELOPMENT OF PERSONALITY Erik Erikson had the epigenetic psycho-sexual percentage points of man in his individual(prenominal)ity theory. My theory has a like tips of man but mine does not focus on the psycho-sexual but preferably the development of personality through with(predicate) points of life. A person on one side of the spectrum could stay in one comprise their whole life or move progressively through, a person skunk only move through the storys by and by mastering the crisis at that symbolise.My theory is designed this way because I always shake considered myself a late bloomer compared to others. any person is divergent and finding their corner in a symbolise is up to the development of that person and their state of self actualization. My first point in time starts at the begin at birth and ends in an individuals cardinals. My first stop is tagged the purlieu leg. This is the first face after a electric s renderr is born and ends around 18 months. A coddle cannot speak or channelize in any way overleap for cry. In this layer a baby first becomes aware of their environment.Since they can do nothing for themselves, a baby exposes archaean on if their environment is a corroboratory or negative environment. Hence, the start of self actualization within their environment. In this give a kid also chooses to be a positive or negative contribution to society. My second tip is the bank ramification, similar to Eriksons oral-sensory stage. This builds after the environment stage because a baby learns to reliance their environment or suspect it. Erikson backs up my telephone call with, the amount of trust is derived from earlier infantile experience depends on the quality of the maternalistic relationship (Erikson,1964 ).The health sell provide r is the childs main environment. If caregiver does not feed children or control while child is crying doubt is created. If the child has more mistrust over trust self actualization has already been blocked. Social forces engender already showed the child their environment is flawed. Proving rising above hard. The troika stage is the designer stage. This is usually the mickle training stage and starts around 18 months and last public treasury around age three. A child wishes to express their needs and wants and pushes their environment anyway they can.This is where a child begins to want to come upon and rise more or less their negative environment. They want to express their power over their caregivers who put up provided for them. A child wants to show they can do things themselves. This is the beginnings of a child thinking of being superior over others. Superior in that this stage is the start of the striving for superiority. A child understands their limitations and t ries to gain power in other ways. This idea of superior is a new-sprung(prenominal) concept and a child does not understand how to express it yet.The fourth stage is the curiosity stage and starts at age three and last till the child is about quintuple years old. A child is becoming more twisting within their environment. They want to contribute but since they pay off no knowledge butt to contribute they explore the options presented in their environment. They learn and this is the beginning of thought what is acceptable in society and what is not. A feel of ostentation when mastering a learned practise is a common trait in this stage. The four stages listed above happen early on in life, usually surrounded by 0 and 5 years.Most hit the stages when their peers do but some do aerify through them while others take longer in some areas. My theory does not put set ages on stages because each person is diametrical. My theory on growth personality does not put a set age on a stage because I know people can even-tempered be healthy and be slow in some stages and master others quickly. The fifth stage is labeled the character stage, like Eriksons stage of identity operator vs confusion and becomes around age five and heptad. This is where the child needs to be a heard and an appreciated connection in their environment. Their self esteem is construct and done for(p) in this stage.I based this part of my theory on my interpretation of Eriksons passage of, alike(p) a trapeze artist, the young person in the snapper of vigorous motion must let go of his safe hold on childhood and reach out for for a firm gasp on adulthood (Erikson, 1964). The sinful nature of people can negatively affect self actualization and blocked a persons growth. This is also the stage a person picks what they want to try to excel in and go for their fit, triggering their beginning introduction to adulthood. The sixth stage is closely following the character stage and sometimes c an happen at the same time.Usually this stage starts around seven years and lasts till around age 12. No matter if self actualization is happening or not this stage is where a person learns they cannot excel at everything better than everyone else. This is where compensation is developed. A person tried to compensate what they lack into something they are good at so they feel a sense of superiority. This is a very important stage for the developed of a person. When a person realizes their sinful nature is much more than what they original thought a child give try to make up for it by being superior in another area.A person driven by a sinful nature always has to feel superior over psyche else in some aspect of their life. This stage is considered the compensation stage. A person cannot become fully self actualized t unless they realize they cannot be the best at everything and their sinful nature will always be present. If a person does not overpower this stage they cannot have d eveloped lasting relationships with others. The later(prenominal) stages are harder to achieve if defense mechanisms are in place due to prior experiences. A person must work through some of their repression, projection, and realization to achieve the later stages of life.Not every shade has to be revealed but some has to come into light so a person can understand themselves well enough to grow into the next stages. The seventh stage is the acquaintance stage and starts around age twelve and lasts till early twenties. This stage resembles Eriks intimacy vs isolation stage. After the sixth stage a person begins to develop deeper feelings for others around them. Since they have felt superior over others a person feels they can gain deferred payment and support from significant others. This is where a person finally feels it is hunky-dory to be them because they have felt superior.My theory is important to understand that a person cannot uprisely love another without feeling a sen se of superiority over someone. The reason being because they have to first appreciate themselves in advance they can let others appreciate them. A person try at this stage can cause problems in their relationships from past broken relationships they watched as a child. The one- octonaryh stage involves another person and has an age around betwixt twenty to thirty years. Intimacy is where two people have enough trust in each other to put by their superiority complex.The two people enter into mature love. This is the stage people consider getting married and sharing their future with someone else. They realize their follower is going to be better at things then them and that is okay because they have trust that their significant other likes them for who they are in Gods image. Signs of divorces happens in this stage due to the lack of putting aside their superior attitude and letting their own will dominate. Divorce can happen in any later stage but in this stage if superior at titudes are not put aside, the nuptials could be marked for divorce.A person still believe they are better than their partner and nothing their partner does is ever good enough. This thinking can lead to fights, problems and built up of negative emotions. This is the result in lack of trust. This is where moving on from the trust stage correctly is key. If a person mistrust others they cannot fully give themselves to their partner. The mistrust leads to idolise. Fear that the other person sees their true self and that self is not good enough. The Bible tells us in pot 418, There is no headache in love but perfect love casteth out business organization because fear hath torment.He that that fearth is not made prefect love (Bible). The Bible points to mature love and fear as being opposites. When a person is overconfident in themselves they do not fear their partner loving them for their true selfs. My theory states above that a better cannot become confident in themselves with feeling superior to someone. Thus stage seven and eight follow each other. The ninth stage in my theory is the stage of curse themselves into their world and begins after marriage. This is a stage where that person is ready to accept full responsible of themselves and their significant other.Usually a person strives for a profession not just simply a job. They want to assert themselves and use their superiority to expand into their work. In this stage a person establishes themselves in the adult world. This is the largest stage in my theory because a person is always exploitation and changing to become who they wish to become. If self actualization is blocked a person cannot reach their full potential and they underachieve. A person will compensate in this stage to make their day- envisages come true. My last stage is the mature adult stage and is found somewhere in middle adult life.This stage is defined has understanding that as an adult taking care of significant others you wi ll have to do unpleasant tasks that they know will have to be achieved. In this stage a person takes responsibility for their own life, even the parts they do not like or didnt particular choose to live. I believe in this stage a person understands their sinful nature and understand how they have been been made in Gods perfect image. Everyone has heard of a midlife adult crisis, and my theory explains how a person can go through it.A midlife crisis is defined has an identity and pledge that can occur in the middle of life because a person is struggling to find who they are in Gods image. deportment express above I believe we are all different and will all hit the stages at different times. I believe a person must complete all stages to achieve self-actualization. If a stage is not overcame correctly, it will affect the next stage. My theory is different in that I believe a person can mountain front stages while being in a different stage. I believe this because we can realize o ur past mistakes and correct them. God has made it clear that we are his sinful people.FUTHER APPLICATIONS Unlike most psychologists, I do not believe our ideates have much stock in our unconscious or our shades we store within it. I believe we are merely human and do not have all the answers but we try to pretend that we do. We try to base a decision generally on a piece of selective information only because we saw it pop up in our dream or we rationalize that we are supposed to do something but we dreamed about it. I believe dreams are only created from the last things we think about before we brag into kip. The things we think about cover before sleep are fresh in our minds so our brain continues to process them.I have come to this conclusion because of how I study. I study normal during day but right before going to sleep I can read over my notes and drift off to sleep rereading them to myself. Most potential than not I will dream about something I have studied. My theory is the opposite of Freud and his followers regarding dream interpretation. His dream interpretation is defined has the assigning of centre to dreams. He has concepts of evident content, possible dream-thoughts and dream work. He is also under the characterisation we remember our dreams upon waking and dreams are supposed to be fulling.The only aspect of his theory that my theory agrees with is the exemplary nature of dreams. I cannot possible begin to describe every dream I have ever had. Nobody can remember each dream so his term of manifest content does not hold truth in my theory. I disagree with latent dream-thoughts concept as well, as stated above, psychologists cannot interpret symbols within dreams. But, my theory agrees somewhat with the symbolic nature of dreams. Like I said dreams are only the last thoughts we have before sleep. If a person has a thought of someone they do not like they could dream of punching that person in their dream.The act of negatively hurt th e person shows how they dislike them. My theory does agree with the symbolic nature of dreams. With this being stated, symbolic dreams are defined has the dreams representing an action or thought you have hidden within a persons shade. The neurosis of a person is their sinful nature and how society alters a person from Gods image. A Christian can only be free of the magnetic core of their sinful nature by believe and understanding Christ sent his only son to the cross for us. A person has a negative neurosis when they have an excessive tension because of lack in trust of Gods intend for them on this world.Tension is built when a persons sinful nature is overwhelming and a person knows their nature is wrong. A person is only fulfilling their needs, not Gods plan for them. Isiah 611-3 shows us what God plotted to do with each of our lives. He knows we have problems but since he is God we can only overcome our sinful nature. To fix a persons neurosis they must adapt God above their sinful nature and discipline themselves to read his word and understand our personal struggles have already been overcome by our Lord. My psychotherapy approach understands muddle a persons neurosis is not always has simple has following Gods words.If it was that easy everyone would live a life without sin which is not possible. This is where a trained psychologists can have a positive impact in your life. Like many humanistic approaches, my theory called for a personal relationship between affected role and healer. A therapist can use their own life and experiences as an example of how a Christian life should be lived. A Christian is not perfect nor do they not make mistakes. By developing a personal relationship the therapist can show examples of their past mistakes and how with Gods grace they have locomote past that aspect of their sinful nature.The therapist can help a patient work through their sinful nature to come to self-actualization. If a person is not a Christian and they go to a therapist using my theory the therapist must bring the person to Christ or at least have the understanding of where my theory is based on. Without understanding how they can never really out live their sinful nature, but God loves us for who we are. EVALUTION There are strengths and flunk involved when dissusing any theory but for mine specifically s