The Handmaids Tale

ENGLISH ITERATURE ESSAY Chloe Reynolds ?The Handmaids Tale written by Marg argont Atwood is an extreme dystopic flock of the oppression of women, their dears and libber values. Atwood describes a theocracy in which women are ?base on ballsing wombs paradigm for reproduction only. In Gi tend, the imperious in which the tale is educate, women are denied their identities and their own personal exemption. To have the best this de graciousisation, the libber icons in the newspaper publisher such as Offred, the lead char kneader, re come a counsel to reminiscing just ab bulge out the pasts as an escape route from this totalitarian regime. Atwood heightens the dystopic effects of her novel by every(prenominal)usion. Allusion legitimises the worst aspects of this bon ton use the Rachel and Bilhah story from Genesis 30 that ultimately perverts the true bearing of Rachels actions. In this story, Rachel uses Bilhah, her maid, as a surrogate m an otherwise(prenominal) because she is unable to produce children for her husband Jacob and, hence, uses a handmaiden. The dry thing is that all(a) biblical allusions are selected in instal to underwrite olden interest. Irony is a refreshing important tool is Atwoods commentary. The way the authorities have act to create a utopia has, in-turn, created a dystopia. The vision of an ideal or model k without delayledge domain shrouded in harmony has been clouded by an unrealistic, out of the question world that could only be called a Dystopia. Women are the centre of this dystopia, without them the Gileadian geniusship would be non existent, flush women are hardened as transfer invoke victims with no liberty to shoot their own heatrs or even keep the children they bear. Children beared by the handmaids go straight to the commanders wives as if they are naught ofttimes than a business transaction, even prizes, The commanders wife looks down at the fuck up as if it is a bouquet of flowers, whatsoeverthing shes won, a tri besidese. P136 The corporation of Gilead and the fiber of the handmaid is based around sex and pregnancy as amicable obligations, non personal prizes. Women are quiesce treat as objects, degraded, controlled and undermined by a distorted theocracy. We are two-legged wombs, thats all: sacred vessels, ambulant chalices. P146 Offred refuses to lose her perspective and continually reminisces about her pat to help wield her sanity. This is the ?reconstruction technique that Atwood uses in her commentary. It kind-heartedises Offred, reservation her appear as if she does rattling have thoughts, feelings and memories, she has non even so been disjointed by society. Offred does not openly disagree with what is expiry on around her, she discreetly sits on the fence and does what is necessary, zip fastening more, nothing slight. I indigence everything back, the way it was. But in that location is no drumhead to is, this wanting. P132 Offred accepts the fact hat in that look upon is nothing she can do to change the situation that she is in so she lives with it. Moira, on the other hand, is the complete opposite. She is Offreds best friend and a pillar of feminism. Moira had a bad reputation with the aunts because she lock in had a taste for independence and doesnt hesitate to influence other handmaids. She was openly rebellious, a ?loose woman and this bestowed mightiness on her. Moira had power now, shed been set loose, shed set herself loose. She was now a loose woman. I think we found this frightening. Moira was care an elevator with open steads. She do us dizzy¦ Moira was our conjuration¦ In the light of Moira, the aunts were less dreadful and more absurd. P143 Moira was deal a goddess to the other handmaids, psyche they could adhere to, someone they could affirm on. Contrarily, Janine was on the other side of the deference scale. She had entirely at sea her identity and is referred to as a puppy that had been kicked too often, by too many people. P139 She is a fatigued and pitiful casing who cannot be trusted. Where Moira is strong and genuine, Janine is snivelling and transparent. She for crap do anything for a import of approbation. These three central characters, Offred, Moira and Janine say how diametrical women conformed to the regime that they had to cede to. Offred reminisces about her past for soothe and to maintain her sanity. Moira unguardedly demonstrates her disrespect for ascendance and inturn makes herself a role model. Lastly, Janine volitionally kisses the feet of her get the hang and does what shes told without interrogation. These women were denied the right to question the authorities and their intentions. Women were specify to ?conjugal obligations collect to the old values and beliefs that were central to regime.

Gilead actually did do some gentle things for women in society patronage the negative aspects that were loosely prevalent. Females had acquire the night - it was safe for them to walk the streets. They were given freedom from obscenities; however, this seems ironic considering the ceremonies the handmaids had to undergo. Handmaids are all fitting and vital to the result and pick of Gilead; they became revered. With some of these positive aspects in that respect were also negative, yet it makes it knotty to decided from an outsiders point of stare whether they were better off. in that respect was barely any crime, no documented poverty and no competition between women for love, marriage. However, in that respect is no love, no plectron and no freedom. These things are tender nature and to take them foreign from not only women but also men for the train of winning a state of war seems incredibly in pityinge. The authorities of Gilead only ruled out love as natures norm and considered it something pushed by the magazines of Pre-Gilead. Generally, a theocracy is a regime that bases their political laws on a faith. Gileads laws are based on Christianity but they twisted the morality around so much that that it is almost used as a scapegoat. The oppression of women and dystopic vision of their rights and values at the ?hands of a distorted religion makes our twentieth century minds cringe at the freedom and choice that they were denied. In the present, issues such as sex, love, marriage, childbirth are taken so much fro granted that it is unthinkable how people such as ourselves would react in this manikin of situation. Gileadian authorities were trying to work up a society that was unbreakable by transcription loveless marriages and shredding deformed babies, not to mention countless other things. In the process they denied human spirit, human love and human emotion. They tore down feminist values and rights and made women convincible to institutionalised rape for reproduction. patriarchal values and beliefs were thrown out of proportion making it a mans world, fulfilling men, demoralising women. If you want to get a full essay, stray it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper